BRAND - Gillette responds to Harry's and Dollar Shave Club

Gillette is rapidly moving to a more cost effective shave

In a "very different approach", Gillette said it will introduce lower-cost razors and beef up its disposable shaver collection.

Gillette will start selling new three-blade and five-blade razors in January that will cost less than $10. It will also start selling disposable razors that will feature the Gillette cooling technology.

This new approach appears to be Gillette's latest response to subscription competitors who have been very disruptive. Until now, Gillette had focused most attention on its expensive Fusion razors, marketing itself as a top-tier brand. That strategy and the rushed to market copycat, Gillette Shave Club, hasn't paid off.

Gillette's pricey razors opened the space for innovation in men's grooming

When Procter and Gamble purchased Gillette for $57 billion in 2005, then the largest acquisition in the company's history, Warren Buffett called it "a dream deal." However, a pack of innovative subscription services including Dollar Shave Club, Harry's and ShaveLogic, have chipped away Gillette's market position. "Gillette was poorly positioned to defend (market) share as consumers shifted to cheaper razors," said Joe Agnese, CFRA Research analyst to CNN.

According to Macquarie Research, Gillette now controls about 56% of the market meaning Gillette's share of the U.S. razor market has dropped 11% in the past two years. Sales at Procter and Gamble's grooming unit, which includes Gillette, slumped 6% in the most recent quarter. Yet Procter and Gamble had not launched a new razor line in 12 years. Their strategy seemed to be upgrading the Fusion series while betting on brand power to lure consumers to its higher-priced blades and slogan 'the best a man can be'.


WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT:
Unilever's purchase of Dollar Shave Club for a billion dollars and Target's partnership with Harry's is easier to understand in the light of the Gillette experience. It now seems evident that brand power is expensive and may not be successful for maintaining brand position in the face of innovation. Clearly there is a paradigm shift occurring that doesn't favour legacy brands of the large and powerful consumer directed organizations and retailers.