Showing posts with label ear cropping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ear cropping. Show all posts

09 November 2016

HEALTH - BC Veterinarians Ban Tail Docking

Members of the College of Veterinarians of British Columbia (CVBC) have voted in favour of banning the cosmetic tail docking of dogs, horses and cattle, and tail alteration in horses.

(pets4homes.co.uk)
The ban makes the practice of tail docking and alteration an unethical practice of veterinary medicine, and veterinarians found continuing the practice will face disciplinary action from the CVBC.

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act authorizes the BC SPCA to investigate and recommend charges against any person, veterinarian or otherwise, believed to be carrying out such procedures.

The CVBC banned ear cropping for cosmetic reasons last year and joins a number of other Canadian provinces including Quebec and the Maritimes in banning both of these procedures.

According to the press release: “No scientific evidence supports a welfare or medical benefit for tail docking or alteration, but evidence does show a detrimental effect on behaviour and animal communication, as well as the risk for infection and phantom pain.”

Some breed associations continue to resist bans because of historical practices.

However, College President Dr. Brendan Matthews points out, “veterinarians have an ethical responsibility to the animals they treat and tail docking goes against that responsibility. We ask other provinces to follow suit and for breed associations to recognize the changing times.”

The CVBC calls upon breed associations to bring about changes to their breed standards as has been done in other countries.

England, Wales and Scotland have banned the cosmetic docking of tails since 2007 and the UK Kennel Club does not allow dogs with cropped ears to compete in their shows.

If a dog’s tail has been docked after the legislation was enacted in 2007, the owner must apply to compete and provide a copy of the docking certificate/veterinary letter signed by their veterinarian.

Some individuals have expressed concerns that prohibiting veterinarians from performing cosmetic surgeries will lead to breeders or owners performing the surgery themselves.

This, however, has not been the case in jurisdictions that have passed similar bans in Canada.


28 July 2016

RESEARCH - Cropped and Docked Dogs Perceived as More Aggressive

Cropping ears and docking tails does not only do no good to a dog's overall health and happiness but can damage its ability to communicate with fellow canines and impact its impression on humans, too.

A recent study shows surgically-altered dogs are often seen as more aggressive than unaltered canines which are viewed as more playful and pretty.

Given perception plays a large part in animal welfare and adoptability, for instance, cropping and docking can put a dog in a disadvantageous position.

The study, highlighted in a recent Scientific American piece, claims dogs cut up for cosmetic reasons can also alter perceptions people have about their owners who are viewed as more narcissistic than owners of dogs who don't go under the knife.

In the study participants were shown images of dog breeds commonly given cropped tails and docked ears - the Doberman pinscher, miniature schnauzer, boxer and Brussels griffon.

Shown images of the dogs of the same breed modified and images of ones in the natural state – participants were told the canines were siblings and asked why the ears and tails looked so different.

(Fig. 2 Mills et al 2016)
Fifty-eight percent correctly identified “some dog breeds have part of their ears and tails surgically removed after they are born,” while 40% did not know that these dogs are not born with their ears cropped and tails docked and figured the differences were due to genetic variances.

Increasingly, this surgical modification is being seen as unnecessary, cruel and simply cosmetic and as such is being banned, restricted or strongly discouraged in many jurisdictions.

The American Veterinary Medical Association and Canadian Veterinary Medical Association oppose the procedures on pooches – stating they cause “pain and distress” and are associated with risks inherent to anaesthetic which can range from blood loss to infection.

Opponents say that if you take vanity out of the equation as justification for docking and cropping, there really isn't any reason for the surgeries.

“The essential question is not, 'How harmful is the procedure?' but rather, “is there sufficient justification in performing it?” the AVMA states on its website.

“Performing a surgical procedure for cosmetic purposes, (ie, for the sake of appearances,) implies the procedure is not medically indicated. Because dogs have not been shown to derive self-esteem or pride in appearance from having their tails docked (common reasons for performing cosmetic procedures on people,) there is no obvious benefit to our patients in performing the procedure. The only benefit that appears to be derived from cosmetic tail docking of dogs is the owner's impression of a pleasant appearance.”

Dog ear cropping is done under anaesthetic (and requires cutting a large portion of the floppy part of the ear off and taping what's left to a hard surface to force them to stand erect,) when the canine is just six to 12 weeks of age.

Tail docking often happens when a dog is just days old and involves muscles, tendons, nerves, bone and cartilage being severed.

There appears to be a shift away from the practices, with many popular veterinary textbooks no longer including information on ear cropping procedures.

But still, dogs everywhere are hardly immune from being cosmetically modified.
Despite the surgeries widely being dubbed as “elective,” the cropped ear and docked tail is often par for the course for breed standards and as of 2014, only two U.S states have restrictions on tail-docking and just nine regulate ear cropping.

The American Kennel Club continues to advocate for these procedures with their website stating, "Each of these procedures is a safe, humane standard practice that serves a practical purpose, and in the case of ear cropping and tail docking, preserves a dog’s ability to perform its historic function."

In parts of Europe and Australia pooches are protected by bans on the surgeries.

As of January 2017, the cosmetic procedures will be banned in Quebec - Alberta and Ontario being the only Canadian provinces without legislation outlawing ear cropping and tail docking.

The procedures are painful but that isn't the whole picture behind why some are so adamantly opposed to docking and cropping.

A University of British Columbia study claims docking a dog's tail “impairs communication with other dogs” - the lack of a full tail which is used to convey messages between canines leaving the dog stumped, so to speak, when it comes to communicating with other dogs.

While the practice of cropping and docking isn't new, tails were docked during Roman times to reduce the spread of rabies and ears were cropped to prevent damage during fighting and hunting, it appears to many that it is has no place in modern times.

“Docked tails can also develop a neuroma or nerve tumor. This can cause pain and make your dog snappy if her tail is touched,” Andy Roark, a Cleveland Park Animal Hospital vet told webMD.

Studies show that dogs communicate emotion like anger and excitement by wagging their tails, so docking may interfere with your dog's ability to interact with other dogs.”

By Nadia Moharib
Nadia is an animal lover who has adopted everything from birds to hamsters, salamanders, rabbits, fish and felines. She has written about all-things-pets for years and was a long-time editor of a pet magazine in a daily newspaper which featured a Q & A column, Ask Whit, penned by her pooch (ghost written, of course.) The serial dog owner lives in Calgary, Alberta and most days can be found at a dog park picking up after her rescue pooch, Scoots.

08 February 2016

Quebec Bans Tail Docking and Ear Cropping


Quebec's Order of Veterinarians has moved to prohibit certain cosmetic surgeries as of January 2017.

Veterinarians will no longer be able to dock or cut the tails of dogs, cattle or horses for cosmetic reasons. The order also bans ear cropping for cats and dogs because it goes against the principles of ensuring an animal's well-being.

Originally most tail docking and ear cropping was done for practical purposes - often to protect a working animal from injury. Today, most dogs are pets and don't have the same threat of injury and the procedure is often done to meet breed standards, so the surgery is considered cosmetic.

Ear cropping involves cutting off up to two-thirds of the ear flap when the dog is 4-6 months old. It has been banned in many European countries, Australia, New Zealand and Scandinavia.

Tail docking is performed when the puppy is only a few days old. In the process, muscles, tendons, nerves, bone, and cartilage is severed. It has been banned in many countries in Europe as well as Australia. Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom voted to ban tail docking in March 2006, except for working dogs or for medical reasons.

With this move by Quebec to ban cosmetic ear cropping and tail docking, Alberta and Ontario are the only provinces in Canada without legislation outlawing these surgeries.

09 November 2015

British Columbia Bans Ear Cropping

British Columbia joins most of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia by banning cosmetic ear cropping of dogs. Ear cropping is considered to be an unethical practice and any person that continues to crop ears will receive disciplinary action.

College of Veterinarians of British Columbia’s (CVBC) College Registrar and Chief Executive Officer, Larry Odegard said, “Ear cropping is an unnecessary procedure unless carried out in cases of injury or for reasons of health concerns.” There are no known welfare or medical benefits from ear cropping and there are known behavioural consequences; specifically communication with people and other dogs.

Several breed associations are against the ban stating that purebred breeds will not be saved for future generations if their ears were not cropped. Veterinarians and scientists have stated that cosmetic surgery is a human alteration and is unwarranted. Odegard said, “Veterinarians have an ethical responsibility to the animals they treat. Ear cropping goes against that responsibility.” The Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) is also against canine cosmetic surgery. The CVMA regularly encourages breed associations to change their breed standards so that cosmetic surgeries no longer occur. In the United Kingdom, dogs with cropped ears are prohibited from competing.

The British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’ CEO, Craig Daniell said, “For nearly two decades we have been on record opposing procedures such as tail docking, ear cropping, devocalization and declawing that impact an animal’s ability to experience good welfare and to express natural behaviours.”


07 August 2015

CKC Seeks Comments on Proposed Breed Standard Amendments

The Canadian Kennel Club (CKC) is seeking input from breeders and owners of Miniature Pinschers and Norfolk Terriers regarding proposed breed standard amendments. The proposed changes include tail docking, ear cropping, and dewclaw removal. To read the amendment details and provide input please login to the CKC website and go to Membership Services/Publish for Comment. Alternately, the amendments may be mailed by calling 1.800.250.8040. The deadline for comments is August 14, 2015.

Tail docking, ear cropping and dewclaw removal are highly debated subjects. Several provincial veterinary regulators are preventing resident veterinarians from performing these alterations. Naturally this is concerning for several CKC members. The CKC said that, “Legislative and societal changes provides a need to accommodate those that chose not to crop, dock or remove dewclaws, many of whom wish to participate in CKC events. It is about providing options.”