Showing posts with label it. Show all posts
Showing posts with label it. Show all posts

21 February 2017

BUSINESS - Mind the IT Gap

There is a gap between what businesses expect from their IT departments and CIOs, and what these departments and executives can provide.

And a wise business owner or investor will pay attention to that gap, or risk falling into it.

Deloitte recently released a global CIO survey highlighting major areas of disconnect between expectations and capabilities.

They found that CIOs can have significant positive influence on the long-term success of the company when they develop capabilities in their IT departments.

This positive influence was true regardless of the personality of the individual CIO, as long as that executive could adapt and respond to the specific needs of their team and organization.

This fits with what The Bayard Partnership has noted as the most common stumbling block for CIOs – the inability to influence either upper management or their own teams.

Deloitte’s research suggests that CIOs tend to be less relationship-oriented than other CxOs, and paired with Bayard’s finding, this indicates that CIOs need to focus on building their relationships with both management and their own teams.

However, a key recurrent finding in Deloitte’s research was that the core expectations of the businesses did not match investment and resource allocation within the business, and that’s an issue that no amount of relationship-building can solve.

For example, cybersecurity is a core expectation according to 61% of CIOs, but only 10% said that it was a top priority of the business.

This is a major issue, because without adequate cybersecurity systems, businesses and organizations are at significant risk.

Similar disconnects between expectation and capabilities exist for categories such as improving business practices, reducing costs, increasing efficiency, maintaining systems, and driving business innovation.

When the capabilities are not currently in place, the infrastructure is not being built, and the talent is not being pursued or properly cultivated, can businesses reasonably expect IT departments and CIOs to deliver? Clearly not.

Talent, like cybersecurity, is a significant issue.

For agile tech talent, demand is four times the supply, and big-data talent is similarly in high demand.

Many businesses are failing to entice or maintain their tech talent.

In some cases, such as Uber’s issues keeping industry-leading women engineers on their teams, talent is actually being driven away.

These gaps are not new.

After all, investment in long-game improvements to core business capabilities always hurt the bottom line before they help it, and a fast-moving marketplace doesn’t feel hospitable to those “short-term pain for long-term gain” choices.

And yet, as Computer Weekly states in their series on CIO development and digital innovation, “If companies are unwilling to use technology to disrupt their business, someone else will do it for them. Businesses must be truly up to date with the changes being driven by technology, and be wary of the opportunities and threats.”

Disruption is already here, and CIOs (and their organizations!) are going to have to take the plunge and make the investments that allow capabilities to catch up to expectations.

Without closing the gap in critical IT areas businesses will not be able to deploy an effective digital strategy, and without that strategy, they risk falling in.

About Tiffany Sostar
Tiffany is a published academic, an editor with the Editors Association of Canada, an independent scholar and researcher, and a self-care and narrative coach. She is particularly interested in the intersection of technology and identity - how our tools shape our selves and change our stories, and in how the nature of work is changing as we incorporate more technology into our daily lives.

19 August 2011

HP to ‘Reinvent’ Company With Return to Roots

By spinning off Hewlett-Packard Co.’s personal-computer business, Chief Executive Officer Leo Apotheker is shedding a unit the founders never liked anyway.

From Hewlett-Packard’s beginnings in 1939, the company’s founders set out to invent one-of-a-kind products and tools for engineers, they never intended to become the biggest provider of a commodity product. Now that PC profits are waning amid competition from Asian rivals, Apotheker is poised to return to the original philosophy.

Hewlett-Packard’s move mirrors a broader shift among U.S. technology companies, with fewer of them designing and selling PCs -- a trend that began when International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) offloaded its PC unit to China’s Lenovo Group Ltd. in 2005. Dell Inc. (DELL), the second-largest PC maker, also is focusing more on services, though PCs still make up about half its sales.

Read more at http://bloom.bg/qtyR23